Scr. Romae iv Non.
Sept. a. 703 (51). CAELIVS CICERONI S. ¦ M. CAELIUS RUFUS TO CICERO, Rome, 2nd
September, 51BC
Romae
(locative); at Rome
Each Roman month
had three principal days:
[i] Kalendae,
-ārum (Kal.): the Kalends (Calends); the first day of the month (which involves
no thinking at all because it always refers to the first of the month)
[ii] Nōnae, -ārum
(Non.): the Nones; [i] seventh day of March, May, July, October; [ii] fifth
day of all other months
[iii] Īdūs, -uum
(Id.) the Ides; [i] fifteenth day of March, May, July, October; [ii] thirteenth
day of all other months; Caesar was assassinated on the Ides of March i.e. the
15th
Step-by-step
IV NON.
SEPT.
[1] This letter
refers to the Nones of September i.e. the 5th day of the
month
[2] The preceding
IV [IV NON.] refers to 4 days before and including the
Nones itself, and so you start counting backwards from the Nones
Day 1: 5th
│ the Nones of September
> Day 2: 4th
of September
> Day 3: 3rd
of September
> Day 4:
2nd of September
[3] a(nnō) 703
│ in the year 703
Romans used two
different ways of expressing the year, and sometimes both are written in the
same text:
[i]
Consular dating: two consuls were elected each year, serving together,
each with veto power over the other's actions. Roman years were customarily
denoted according to the names of the two consuls who held office that year:
C.
Fabiō et L. Virgīniō ¦ cōnsulibus │ During the consulship
of Gaius Fabius and Lucius Virginius ¦
literally: with GF and LV ¦ (being) consuls [ablative absolute] = while GF and LV were
consuls = during the consulship of GF and LV
L.
Genuciō et Q. Servīliō cōnsulibus mortuus est Camillus. │
Camillus died during the consulship of Lucius Genucius and Quintus Servilius.
From
the perspective of a 21st century reader this provides little if any
further information; a UK reader may know, for example, what years a person was
British Prime Minister but that historical knowledge isn’t guaranteed.
[ii]
ab urbe conditā (AUC)│ from the founding of the city
The
year was also calculated based on the number of years that had passed since the
foundation of Rome i.e. 753BC, and, like the dates, 753 itself is included
in the calculation. Therefore, whatever year is expressed, you subtract
that from 754: a. 703; 754 – 703 = 51BC
In
general, we need to be a little circumspect when dealing with dates referring
to events 2000 years ago, and there is not always consistency and / or accuracy
in calculation. In the end – despite the date appearing in one of the
manuscripts of Pliny’s letter – nobody is really sure when exactly Mount
Vesuvius erupted. It is now generally accepted that either Pliny was wrong
(there is physical and written evidence that the eruption happened later in the
year) or couldn’t remember and felt he had to write something, or a date was
added or misinterpreted by a scribe. I have my own thoughts on that one, but
I’ll keep them to myself until we look in detail at Pliny’s account of
Vesuvius.
No comments:
Post a Comment