The following quotation from Cicero is a good example of an extended series of indirect questions which are introduced by interrogative words, or yes-no questions or double / alternative questions
Dē istīs rēbus
exspectō tuās litterās, quid Arrīus nārret, quō animō sē
dēstitūtum ferat, et quī cōnsulēs parentur, utrum,
ut populī sermō, Pompēius et Crassus an, ut mihi scrībitur, cum Gabīniō
Servius Sulpicius, et num quae novae lēgēs et num quid nōvī
omnīnō, et, quoniam Nepōs proficīscitur, cuinam augurātus dēferātur;
Dē istīs rēbus
exspectō tuās litterās, │ I am awaiting your letter about these matters:
[i] quid Arrīus
nārret │ what Arius is saying
[ii] quō animō sē dēstitūtum ferat │ in what state of mind
he bears his abandonment
[iii] et quī cōnsulēs parentur, │ and which men are being
prepared as consuls
[iv] utrum,
ut populī sermō, Pompēius et Crassus, an, ut mihi scrībitur, cum Gabīniō
Servius Sulpicius,
whether, as popular talk has it, Pompey and Crassus,
or, as is written to me, Servius Sulpicius with Gabinius [i.e. two consuls
were elected each year, and so Cicero refers to two alternatives for the joint
consulship]
[v] et num quae
novae lēgēs │ and whether (there are) any new laws,
[vi] et num quid nōvī omnīnō, │ and whether (there is) anything
new at all,
[vii] et, quoniam
Nepōs proficīscitur, cuinam augurātus dēferātur; │ and, since
Nepos is setting out, to whom the office of augur is to be assigned.
No comments:
Post a Comment