Showing posts with label i-stem nouns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label i-stem nouns. Show all posts

Monday, September 22, 2025

19.12.25: Comenius (1658) LVIII: a Banquet [2] Part 2: text, notes and vocabulary; “Breaking up the Good Cheer”

The Guests being brought in by the Host, 11. wash their Hands out of a Laver, 12. or Ewer, 14. over a Hand-basin, 13. or Bowl, 15. and wipe them on a Hand-towel, 16. then they sit at the Table on Chairs, 17.

Convīvæ intrōductī ab Hospite, 11. abluunt manūs ē Gutturnīō, 12. vel Aquālī, 14. super Malluvium, 13. aut Pēlvim, 15. terguntque Mantīlī, 16. tum assident Mēnsæ per Sedīlia, 17.

The Carver, 18. breaketh up the good Cheer,* and divideth it.

Strūctor, 18. deartuat dapēs, & distribuit.

Sauces are set amongst Roast-meat, in Sawcers, 20.

Embammata interpōnuntur Assatūris in Scutellīs, 20.

Notes

[i] *“the good cheer” something that promotes good spirits especially food; the Latin describes the carver cutting up the the meat of the feast (daps) itself and handing it out to everybody present

[ii] passive forms

convīvæ intrōductī ab hospite │ the guests (having been) brought in by the host …

embammata interpōnuntur assatūris │ sauces are put between the roast meats

[ii]

tum assident mēnsæ per sedīlia │ then they sit at the table on chairs

manūs … terguntque mantīlī │ and they wipe their hands with a hand-towel

sedīle, -is [3/n]: chair

mantīle, or mantēle, -is [3/n]: cloth to wipe the hands or mouth; towel; napkin; see mappa in the previous post

Both are neuter i-stem nouns

Link: 14.06.25: Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [4]; review: i-stem nouns (3)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/140625-level-3-sonnenschein-cunobelinus.html

[iii]

tum assident mēnsæ [dative] │ then they sit at the table

embammata interpōnuntur assatūris [dative] │ the sauces are placed among the roast meats

assideō (or adsideō), -ēre [2]: to sit at, by or near something

interponō, -ere [3]: put / place between or among

Both of these verbs are compounds, formed with a prefix (ad-, inter-) which, when standing alone, act as prepositions; in these verbs the original physical meaning of the preposition is retained. However, many compound verbs in Latin are followed by the dative case; ad and inter as prepositions are followed by the accusative case, but not when attached to the verb as prefixes.

That Comenius put two of them in the text does show what he wanted: he wanted the teacher to explain them.

Link: 13.04.25: Level 3; Verbs with the dative case [1]: compound verbs

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/02/130425-level-3-verbs-with-dative-case-1.html

Vocabulary

[1]

convīva, -ae [1 m/f]: guest

daps, dapis [3/f]: meal; banquet; feast

deartuō, -āre, -āvī, -ātus [1]: dismember

hospes, hospitis [3 m/f]: host (or guest)

strūctor, strūctōris [3/m]: server; carver of food

https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0062:entry=structor-harpers

[2] There are many words in Latin that describe vessels for containing, transporting and pouring liquids, two of which are not in the text but which should be noted:

[i] amphora, -ae [1/f]: two handled clay vessel usually with a blunt end for storage in sand or against a wall or on a ship; wine and garum or liquāmen (fish sauce) were products commonly stored and transported in an amphora, but they would be far too big to pour a small glass of wine at a dinner table!

[ii] urceus, -ī [2/m]: any sort of jug with one handle; image #3 from the  House of Aulus Umbricius Scaurus in Pompeii shows a one-handled garum bottle that would be described as an urceus.


From the text:

[iii] gutturnium, -ī [2/n]: narrow-necked ewer; from guttur, -is [3/n]: throat; neck; the translator uses the older term ‘laver’ which doesn’t quite match the Latin original, a ‘laver’ referring to a washbasin

Also: gūtus (or: guttus) [2/m]: narrow-necked jug or flask to pour small drops of liquids e.g. oil; the word is derived from gutta, - ae [1/f]: drop (of liquid); teardrop; Engl. deriv. gutter

[iv] aquālis, -is [3/m]: vessel for washing e.g. wash-basin, ewer

[v] malluvium, -ī [2/n] wash-handbasin; also: (1) labellum, -ī [2/n]: small water basin; (2)  lābrum, -ī [2/n]: basin; large water container for bathing

“Labrum, R. (lit. a lip). A general term to denote any kind of vessel the brim of which turned over on the outside like the lip of the human mouth; a wide flat basin which stood in the thermal chamber or Caldarium of the Roman baths.” (Mollett: An Illustrated Dictionary of Words used in Art and Archaeology)

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/67629/67629-h/67629-h.htm

[vi] pēlvis, -is [3/f] (acc. -im): shallow bowl or basin, often associated with the washing of feet:

Deinde mittit aquam in pēlvim, et coepit lavāre pedēs discipulōrum (Vulgate) │ After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet

Puerī capillātī attulērunt unguentum in argenteā pēlve pedēsque recumbentium ūnxērunt │  some long-haired boys brought ointment in a silver basin, and anointed our feet as we lay (Petronius)

[vii] abluō, -ere, abluī, ablūtus [3]: wash (off / away); cleanse; purify




[3]

[i] assatūra, -ae [1/f]: (Late) roasted meat

assō, -āre, -āvī, -ātus [1]: roast

assus, -a, -um: roasted; baked

[ii] embamma, embammatis [3/n]: sauce < Anc. Gk. ἔμβαμμα (émbamma); also: iūs, iūris [3/n]: gravy; sauce; juice

From the Apicius cookbook:

iūs in cervō │ venison sauce

embamma in cervīnam assam │ marinade for roast venison

[iii] scutella, -ae [1/f]: small, shallow bowl; the translator gives this as ‘saucer’. However, the 17th century term here does not refer to the saucer you place under your coffee cup, but a small food container used for putting different sauces on a table; Classical definition: “a small tray or salver on which cups could be placed, and not a saucer or dish like its French derivative écuelle” (Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities)

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

11.12.25: Level 3; the best sauce

Dionȳsius tyrannus, epulātus apud Lacedaemoniōs dīxit, "Equidem iūre hōc nigrō minimē dēlector." Nam apud mēnsās pūblicās Spartae iūs nigrum, pānem, frūctūs comedunt; lac et aqua bibitur. Tum coquus respondit, "Minimē mīrum est: condīmenta enim dēsunt. Haec autem condīmenta sunt labōrēs, cursūs, famēs, sītis. Sine hīs nēmō hōc iūre dēlectārī potest."

dēsum, dēesse, defuī, dēfutūrus: be lacking / wanting

Impersonal use: Dominus pāscit mē et nihil mihi dēerit │ The Lord is my shepherd and I shall want nothing [literally: the Lord feeds / nourishes me (as a shepherd) and nothing will be lacking for me.

epulor, -āri, -ātus sum [1]: feast; dine; eat > epulātus │ having dined (deponent verb: passive in form but active in meaning)

equidem: [i] truly; indeed; certainly [ii] (when referring to oneself) for my part; as far as I am concerned; for me

iūs, iūris [3/n] this noun has two entirely separate meanings: [i] law; (legal) right [ii] (here) soup; juice; gravy; bear in mind that the Romans talk far more about law than they do about soup!

sitis, -is [3/f] (singular only): thirst; one of a small group of 3rd declension i-stem nouns that has an accusative in -im  

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/140625-level-3-sonnenschein-cunobelinus.html [Note [2](ii)]

____________________

The tyrant Dionysius, having dined with the Lacedaemonians, said, ‘I, for my part, am not at all pleased with this black soup.’ For at the public tables at Sparta they eat black soup, bread, (and) fruit; milk and water are drunk. Then the cook replied: ‘It is not at all surprising, for the sauces are missing. Now these sauces are toil, running, hunger, (and) thirst. Without these no one can be pleased with this soup.’

Saturday, March 22, 2025

21.06.25: Level 2; Sonnenschein: Maria Britannica [1]: text, exercise, notes

“Lateris prīmī longitūdinem circiter quingenta mīlia esse iūdicat, secundī septingenta, tertiī octingenta. Itaque dē magnitūdine insulae nōn multum errabat. Flūmen Tamesam ā marī circiter octōgintā mīlia distāre iūdicat." Hīc nōs puerī "Errābat igitur" inquimus; "nam inter Londinium et mare nōn sunt octōgintā mīlia." Sed patruus meus "Rectē iudicābat" inquit; "nam pars maris ubi Caesaris castra erant circiter octōgintā mīlia Rōmāna ā Londiniō distat. Tria maria insulam nostram circumdant; inter Britanniam et Galliam est mare Britannicum vel fretum Gallicum; ab occidente mare Hibernicum; ab oriente mare Germānicum. Nōmina marium temporibus antīquīs nōn ūsitāta erant; sed iam Graecī Britanniam esse insulam iūdicābant."

Vocabulary review: match the Latin and English

circiter

circumdō, -dare, -dedī, -dātus [1]

distō, -āre, distitī [1]

errō, -āre, -āvī, -ātus [1]

flūmen, flūminis [3/n]

fretum, -ī [2/n]

Hibernicus, -a, -um

itaque

iūdicō, -āre, -āvī, -ātus [1]

latus, lateris [3/n]

longitūdō, longitūdinis [3/f]

magnitūdō, magnitūdinis [3/f]

occidēns, occidentis [3/m]

oriēns, orientis [3/m]

rēctē

ūsitātus, -a, -um

judge / determine; Irish; east; correctly; channel / estuary; approximately; length; make a mistake; river; stand apart / be distant; size; side; surround; therefore; used / usual / common; west

Note: to review i-stem nouns like mare, -is [3/n]:

Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [4]; review: i-stem nouns (3)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/140625-level-3-sonnenschein-cunobelinus.html

https://www.facebook.com/groups/latinforstarters/posts/817036527574284/


Thursday, March 13, 2025

16.06.25: Level 2; Sonnenschein; Gentium Britannicārum Societās [1]: text, exercise, notes

“Tum patruus meus reliqua de expedītiōne Caesaris narrāvit. "Dum mīlitēs nautaeque Rōmānī classem novīs armīs ornant, Caesar ad reliquās copiās properat. Intereā hostēs summum imperium Cassivellaunō mandāverant. Cassivellaunus nōn erat rēx ūniversārum gentium Britannicārum, sed dux vel princēps gentis Cassōrum. Annō tamen quartō et quinquāgēsimō ante Christum nātum magna pars gentium Britanniae merīdiānae sē sub Cassivellaunō contrā Rōmānōs consociāverant.

Flūmen Tamesa fīnēs Cassivellaunī ā fīnibus gentium maritimārum sēparābat; ab oriente erant fīnēs Trinobantium; ab occidente Britannī mediterrāneī. Superiōre tempore bella continua fuerant inter Cassivellaunum et reliquās gentēs; atque Trinobantēs auxilium Rōmānōrum contrā Cassivellaunum implōrāverant, quia rēgem suum trucīdāverat. Numerus hostium magnus erat; nam, ut Caesar affirmat, infīnīta multitūdō hominum erat in parte merīdiānā Britanniae."

"Caesar formam et incolās Britanniae in capite duodecimō et tertiō decimō librī quintī commemorat. Incolae partis interiōris Celtae et barbarī erant; incolae maritimae partis ex Belgiō praedae causā immigrāverant, sīcut priōre aetāte trans flūmen Rhenum in Belgium migrāverant. Et nōnnulla nōmina gentium maritimārum, unde nōmina urbium hodiernārum dērivāta sunt, Belgica vel Gallica sunt. Belgae autem ā Germānīs oriundī erant, ut Caesar in capite quartō librī secundī dēmonstrat.

Itaque pars Britannōrum antīquōrum Germānicā orīgine erant. Formam insulae esse triquetram dēclārat. Sed ūnum latus ad Galliam spectāre existimat, alterum ad Hispāniam atque occidentem, tertium ad septentriōnēs. Itaque dē lateribus et angulīs laterum errābat. Hiberniam ab occidente parte Britanniae esse rectē iūdicat, insulam Mōnam inter Britanniam et Hiberniam esse."

[1] Vocabulary review: match the Latin and English

aetās, aetātis [3/f]

fīnis, -is [3 m/f]

gens, gentis [3/f]

latus, lateris [3/n]

mediterrāneus, -a, -um

merīdiānus, -a, -um

societās, societātis [3/f]

occidēns, occidentis [3/m]

oriēns, orientis [3/m]

oriundus, -a, -um

praeda, -ae [1/f]

princēps, principis [3/m]

reliquus, -a, -um

septentriō, septentriōnis [3/m]

superior, -ius

triquetrus, -a, -um

alliance; border / territory; chief; descended from; east; inland; north; plunder; previous; remaining; side; southern; summer; triangular; tribe / nation; west

[2] Notes:

i-stem nouns

classis, -is [3/f]: fleet > genitive plural: classium

gēns, gentis [3/f]: tribe; nation > genitive plural: gentium

hostis, -s [3/m]: enemy > genitive plural: hostium

fīnis, -is [3 m/f]: border; territory > genitive plural: fīnium

Trinobantēs [3 m/pl]: name of a Celtic tribe > genitive plural: Trinobantium

pars, partis [3/f]: part > genitive plural: partium

urbs, urbis [3/f]: city > genitive plural: urbium

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2024/04/030324-review-of-3rd-declensions-nouns.html

https://www.facebook.com/groups/latinforstarters/posts/418207734123834/

Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [2]; review: i-stem nouns (1)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/140625-level-3-sonnenschein-pro-patria_11.html

https://www.facebook.com/groups/latinforstarters/posts/817032217574715/

Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [3]; review: i-stem nouns (2);  practice

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/140625-level-3-sonnenschein-pro-patria_31.html

https://www.facebook.com/groups/latinforstarters/posts/817035420907728/

Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [4]; review: i-stem nouns (3)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/140625-level-3-sonnenschein-cunobelinus.html

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

14.06.25: Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [4]; review: i-stem nouns (3)

[1] Neuter nouns ending in -e, -al, -ar undergo the same change in the genitive plural as the i-stem nouns discussed in the previous post i.e. -ium, but they also have changes in the ablative singular [-ī] and nominative / accusative plural [-ia]; such nouns are few in number and not common.


From the authors:

[1] Eundem in exemplāria mīlle trānscrīptum per tōtam Ītaliam prōvinciāsque dīmīsit (Pliny) │ Then  a  thousand  copies  were  written  of  the same memoir,  which  he  dispersed  through all of Italy and the provinces.

[2] Reliquī disseruērunt sine ūllō certō exemplārī fōrmāque reī pūblicae (Cicero) │ His successors have discussed the different types of State and their basic principles without any definite example or model

[3] in eō conclāvī ego perfōdī parietem (Plautus) │ in that same room I have dug a hole through the party-wall

[4] Etiam rogitās, scelestē homō, quī angulōs in omnīs meārum aedium et conclāvium mihi pervium facitis? (Plautus) │ Do you even ask me, you rascally fellow? You who've been making a thoroughfare of every corner of my house, and the rooms under lock and key? (conclāve can refer to a room that is locked)

Note: aedis, aedis [3/f]: [i] temple, shrine [ii] plural (aedēs): house; i-stem noun (the same number of syllables in the nominative and genitive singular)

[5] absolūtum offendī in aedibus tuīs tēctum, quod suprā conclāvia nōn placuerat tibi esse multōrum fastīgiōrum, id nunc honestē vergit in tēctum īnferiōris porticūs (Cicero) │ I found the roof on your house finished: the part over the sitting-rooms, which you did not wish to have many gables, now slopes gracefully towards the roof of the lower colonnade. 

[6] repente glōriāns maria montīsque pollicērī coepit (Sallust) │ suddenly, boasting, he began to promise her seas and mountains

Note: montīs, the alternative accusative plural of the i-stem noun

[7] Quōs vōs implōrāre dēbētis ut … hanc omnibus hostium cōpiīs terrā marīque superātīs ā perditissimōrum cīvium nefāriō scelere dēfendant (Cicero) │ You ought to implore them … with all the forces of the enemy having been overcome on land and (on) sea, that they defend her from this wicked crime of the most dangerous citizens.

[8] Columella on the management of chickens …

Plūrimī etiam īnfrā cubīlium strāmenta grāminis aliquid et rāmulōs laurī │ Very many people also lay a little grass under the litter of the nest-boxes and small branches of bay

[9] Celsus on, well, read it for yourself …

perīculōsa etiam, quae inter febrēs fluēns conquiēscere hominem in cubīlī nōn patitur (Celsus) │ it is dangerous also during fevers when fluid stools allow the patient no rest in bed

[10] Celsus on being bitten …

Dīxī dē iīs vulneribus, quae maximē per tēla īnferuntur. Sequitur, ut dē iīs dīcam, quae morsū fīunt, interdum hominis, interdum sīmiae, saepe canis, nōnnumquam ferōrum animālium aut serpentium │ I have spoken of those wounds which are mostly inflicted by weapons. My next task is to speak of those which are caused by the bite, at times of a man, at times of an ape, often of a dog, not infrequently of wild animals or of snakes.

serpēns, serpentis [3m/f]: snake; gen pl: serpentium or serpentum

This is a good example that leads us to the last point about i-stem nouns …

[2] Before we put this topic “to bed”, remember where we started: The i-declension was confused even to the Romans themselves, nor was it stable at all periods of the language (Allen & Greenough).

In Modern English there can be variations in, for example, plurals and verb forms and so it is not surprising to find slight variations in the Latin language that was used for centuries. In the grammar books, look out for words such as “occasionally” or “(very) rarely” because that is indicating that a form is attested i.e. it was used by an author but it does not frequently occur.

[i] You will come across:

different ablative singular endings for the same noun e.g. mare / marī; nāve / nāvī; colle / collī

different genitive plural endings for the same noun:

apis, apis [3/f]: bee; gen pl: apium or apum

serpēns, serpentis [3m/f]: snake; gen pl: serpentium or serpentum

mēnsis, mēnsis [3/m]: month; gen pl: mēnsium or mēnsum

[ii] a small group of 3rd declension i-stem nouns have an alternative accusative singular in -im

Nominative singular: turris, turris [3/f] tower

Accusative singular: turrim or turrem

Similarly:

febris, febris [3/f]: fever > accusative: febrim or febrem

puppis, puppis [3/f]: stern of a ship > accusative: puppim or puppem

[iii] Some forms are rare or, in fact not attested in Classical Latin, but are evident in later Latin:

Quandō māchinam per verbum suum fēcit Deus caelī, terrae, marium (Mediaeval)│ When by His Word, God made the system of heaven, earth, seas

Latin tutorial:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jm8HjKvzpeE&t=216s

14.06.25: Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [3]; review: i-stem nouns (2); practice

Complete the Latin sentence of phrase with the nouns listed below:

[1] the rights ¦ of citizens │  iūra ¦ __________

[2] the courage ¦ of the races │ virtūs ¦ __________

[3] the legions ¦ of the enemy │ lēgiōnēs ¦ __________ (Plautus)

[4] the plaintive cries ¦ of infants  │ quirītātūs ¦ __________ (Pliny)

[5] (a land) ¦ of many cities and mountains │ (terram) multārum __________ et __________ (Cicero)

[6] in a swarm ¦ of bees │ in __________ … exāmine (Cicero)

[7] the pain ¦ of the eyes, ears and teeth │ oculōrum, __________, __________ dolor (Celsus)

[8] At that time Italy was full ¦ of Greek skills (arts) │ Erat Ītalia tum plēna Graecārum __________ (Cicero)

[9] It is the worst evil ¦ of human minds │ Pessimum … hūmānārum __________ malum est (Quintilian)

[10] Those who understand the language ¦ of birds │ istī quī linguam __________ intellegunt (Pacuvius)

[11] flocks ¦ of sheep │ gregēs __________ (Varro)

[12] …and the soft fat ¦ of foxes and excrement ¦ of cats  │ adips __________ excrēmentumque __________ (Pliny)

apium; artium; aurium; avium; cīvium; dentium; fēlium; gentium; hostium; īnfantium; mentium; montium; ovium; urbium; vulpium


14.06.25: Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [2]; review: i-stem nouns (1)

Many posts were written about third declension nouns; specific reference to i-stem nouns was made here:

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2024/04/030324-review-of-3rd-declensions-nouns.html

https://www.facebook.com/groups/latinforstarters/posts/418206697457271/

A complete set of information is available here:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/latinforstarters/posts/418207734123834/

At that point, it was simply stated that there are 3rd declension nouns known as i-stem where the endings differ slightly from what is the usual pattern because, at that stage, it was enough simply to become familiar with this massive declension of nouns and the changes they undergo. Furthermore, as the quotation below illustrates, it was not necessary to go into such detail:

The i-declension was confused even to the Romans themselves, nor was it stable at all periods of the language (Allen & Greenough)

Even now, this post will only look again in a little more depth as to the changes in i-stem nouns and patterns as to when those changes – which are only slight and do not prevent understanding – take place.

We can divide the third declension into two groups:

image #1: consonant stems (masculine and feminine); the sole focus is the genitive plural that ends in -um

image #2: i-stems [1]

ignis, -s [3/m]: fire; also a 3rd declension noun but note [i] the genitive plural in -ium and [ii] an alternative accusative plural ending i.e. either -ēs (the same as the consonant stems) or -īs; the -īs ending is important to note because [a] it occurs a lot in the literature, and [b] it is the dative and ablative plural of 1st and 2nd declension nouns (where you will most often see it), whereas here, in these 3rd declension nouns, it is an accusative plural.


Alright, it is a question of playing “spot the difference”, but there is a (sort of) pattern to this.

Image #3

[1] Nouns which make these changes are known as non-increasing; this means that the noun has the same number of syllables in the nominative and genitive singular; in grammar this can also be described as parisyllabic.

Compare:

[i] an increasing noun; it has an additional syllable in the genitive singular

Nominative singular: prīn-ceps (chief)

Genitive singular: prīn-ci-pis

[ii] a non-increasing noun; it has the same number of syllables in both the nominative and genitive singular

Nominative singular: fē-lēs (cat)

Genitive singular: fē-lis

Non-increasing nouns end in -s (mainly -is) e.g. cīvis, -is (citizen), fēlēs, -is (cat), hostis, -is (enemy), nāvis, -is (ship)

But remember: just because a noun ends in -s does not mean that it is i-stem; it is the non-increasing nouns that are i-stem.

Compare:

[i] increasing

Nominative singular: mī-les (soldier)

Genitive singular: mī-li-tis

Genitive plural: mīlitum

[ii] non-increasing

Nominative singular: cī-vis (citizen)

Genitive singular: cī-vis

Genitive plural: cīvium

Note: As in any language there are words which do not conform to the “rules” i.e. there are non-increasing nouns which do not take the endings -ium and the alternative accusative plural -īs, for example:

canis, canis (dog); gen. pl: canum; acc. pl: canēs

iuvenis, iuvenis (youth); gen. pl: iuvenum; acc. pl: iuvenēs

māter, mātris (mother); gen. pl: mātrum; acc. pl: mātrēs

pater, patris (father); gen. pl: patrum; acc. pl: patrēs

senex, senis (old man); gen. pl: senum; acc. pl: senēs

This is not something over which you should lose sleep!

Image #4

[2] These changes also apply to monosyllabic nouns (i.e. nouns with one syllable) in the nominative singular which, in the genitive singular, have two consonants as the stem. Note that they all have a consonant + /s/ in the nominative singular. That, I accept, sounds long-winded but take a look at the pattern to see what is happening:

Nominative singular: urbs (city); one syllable

Genitive singular: urb¦is; 2 consonants in the stem

Nominative singular: dēns  (tooth); one syllable

Genitive singular: dent¦is; 2 consonants in the stem

Nominative singular: pars (part); one syllable

Genitive singular: part¦is; 2 consonants in the stem

Words that end in -x can also appear in this category. However, compare:

[i]

Nominative singular: nox /k+s/ (night)

Genitive singular: noctis; 2 consonants in the stem

Genitive plural: noctium

[ii]

Nominative singular: rēx (king)

Genitive singular: rēgis; not with 2 consonants

Genitive plural: rēgum

14.06.25: Level 3; Sonnenschein; Prō Patriā [3]; Cunobelīnus [1]: text; exercise; notes

Itaque per centum ferē annōs rēgēs Britannicī vel rēgīnae Britannicae in Britanniā rēgnāvērunt, nec Rōmānī Britannōs bellō vexāvērunt. In numerō eōrum rēgum erat Cunobelīnus. Is rēvērā "Britannōrum rēx" erat: sīc eum Suētōnius, scrīptor Rōmānus, nōminat. Nam quamquam nōn omnēs gentēs Britannicae eī subiectae erant, tamen magnam partem gentium Britanniae mediterrāneae et merīdiānae in ūnum rēgnum cōnsociāverat. Caput eārum gentium Camulodūnum erat. Exstant hodiē nummī Cunobelīnī; in eīs nōmen rēgis vel litterās nōnnūllās eius nōminis lēctitāre possumus: exstant quoque nummī patris eius Tasciovānī et frātris eius Epaticcī.

Cunobelīnus multōs annōs rēgnāvit; eō ferē tempore rēx Britannōrum erat cum Tiberius et Caligula prīncipēs Rōmānōrum erant. Eī ab annō quārtō decimō ad annum prīmum et quadrāgēsimum post Chrīstum nātum imperiō Rōmānō praeerant. Iēsus Chrīstus nātus erat dum Augustus prīnceps erat: mortī datus erat dum Tiberius imperitābat, ut Tacitus in capite quārtō et quadrāgēsimō librī quīntī decimī Annālium commemorat. Inter fīliōs Cunobelīnī erant Caractacus et Togodumnus. Is rēx magnus et bonus erat, atque dēfēnsor ācer lībertātis Britannicae. Sed Rōmānī tantum rēgem tolerāre nōn poterant. Itaque dē novā expedītiōne contrā Britanniam cōgitābant.

Poētae Rōmānī eius aetātis īnsulam nostram et incolās eius saepe commemorant. Horātius eōs "ferōs" et "remōtōs" et "intāctōs" id est "nōn dēbellātōs" vel "līberōs" nōminat: Vergilius eōs "tōtō orbe terrārum dīvīsōs" id est "sēparātōs" vocat. Mare eōs ab aliīs partibus orbis terrārum sēparābat; et lībertās eīs cāra erat. Prō ārīs et focīs suīs contrā Rōmānōs magnā virtūte pugnāverant, atque hostibus Rōmānōrum in bellō Gallicō auxilia subministrāverant. Itaque Rōmānī lībertātem eōrum nōn tolerābant.

Identify the cases and explain why they are being used:

[1] nec Rōmānī Britannōs bellō vexāvērunt

[2] magnam partem gentium Britanniae mediterrāneae

[3] Cunobelīnus multōs annōs rēgnāvit

[4] eō ferē tempore

[5] Eī … imperiō Rōmānō praeerant.

[6] mortī datus erat

[7] mare eōs ab aliīs partibus orbis terrārum sēparābat

[8] lībertās eīs cāra erat

[9] magnā virtūte pugnāverant

Notes

annālis, annālis [3/n]: chronicle; mainly in plural i.e. annālēs: chronicles, annals

gēns, gentis [3/f]: people; nation; tribe

mors, mortis [3/f]: death

orbis, orbis [3/m]: circle; ring; anything circular

orbis terrārum: the earth; the globe

pars, partis [3/f]: part

These nouns have been seen before. However, take a second look at them because they are all known as i-stem nouns, a topic which was referred to some time back. However, now at Level 3, we will take some time to discuss them again in more detail which will be the focus of the next few posts.

____________________

[1] nec Rōmānī Britannōs bellō vexāvērunt │ and the Romans did not trouble the Britons with (by means of) war; ablative of means

[2] magnam partem gentium │ a large part / the majority of the tribes; partitive genitive; gēns, gentis [3/f]: tribe; nation

[3] Cunobelīnus multōs annōs rēgnāvit │ Cunobelinus ruled for many years; accusative of duration of time

[4] eō ferē tempore │ at around that time; ablative of time when

[5] Eī … imperiō Rōmānō praeerant. │ they were in charge of the Roman empire; dative after the verb praesum, praeesse

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/02/130425-level-3-verbs-with-dative-case-1.html

https://www.facebook.com/groups/latinforstarters/posts/730075776270360/

[6] mortī datus erat │ he was given to death [ = he was put to death]; dative of the indirect object

[7] mare eōs ab aliīs partibus orbis terrārum sēparābat │ the sea separated them from other parts of the world; ablative of separation

[8] lībertās eīs cāra erat │ freedom was dear to them; dative after the adjective cārus, -a, -um

[9] magnā virtūte pugnāverant │ they had fought with great courage; ablative of manner i.e. the way in which they fought


Saturday, May 4, 2024

23.04.24: third declension NOUNS: summary [3]

 This is the one that matches with the 3rd declension adjectives

Monday, April 22, 2024

03.04.24: review of 3rd declension nouns (final); notes on i-stem nouns

DĒ POTESTĀTE RŌMĀNĀ [Chesnutt: the Road to Latin (1933)]

In principiō Rōma erat parva urbs. Bellō potestātem augēbat. Prīmō proeliō cum gentibus proximīs gerēbantur. Virtūs gentium proximārum erat magna sed Rōmānī erant victōrēs. Tandem Rōma erat domina Italiae. Trāns mare habitābant Carthāginiēnsēs. Erant hostēs Rōmānōrum. Magnam classem habēbant; itaque mare regēbant. Magnum numerum nāvium longārum habēbant et bellum amābant. Erant longa bella inter Rōmānōs et Carthāginiēnsēs; magna erat caedēs. Tandem Rōmānī erant victōrēs; itaque Rōma erat domina maris. Tum in Asiā et in Galliā et in Britanniā bella gerēbantur. Tandem Asia, Gallia, Britannia in Rōmae potestāte erant. Sīc terrā marīque potestās Rōmāna erat maxima.

Vocabulary

(a) 3rd declension nouns

caedēs, caedis [3/f]: slaughter, massacre

classis, -is [3/f]: fleet

gēns, gentis [3/f]: race, tribe

hostis, hostis [3/m]: enemy; often pl: hostēs (the enemy)

nāvis, -is [3/f]: ship

nāvis longa: warship

potestās, potestātis [3/f]: power, abili

(b) other words

augeō, augēre [2]: increase

Carthāginiēnsis: Carthaginian; the spelling is sometimes with a /k/: Karthāginiēnsis

i-stem nouns

[1] From this post and the previous one (02.04.24: Review of 3rd declension nouns [5]):

The five nouns listed below are all 3rd declension, but they are a subset classified as i-stem nouns:

urbs, urbis [3/f]: city

cīvis, -is [3 m/f]: citizen

gēns, gentis [3/f]: race; tribe

nāvis, -is [3/f]: ship

mare, -is [3/n]: sea

Now look at those nouns in context and their endings in bold:

[i] -ium

Rōma est maxima urbium │ Rome is the greatest of the cities

iūra cīvium Rōmānōrum │ the rights of Roman citizens

virtūs gentium proximārum erat magna │ the courage of the neighbouring races

magnum numerum nāvium longārum habēbant │ they had a great number of long ships

[ii] -ī

ā marī paucae nāvēs Rōmam veniunt │ few ships come from the sea to Rome

terrā marīque │ by land and by sea

[iii] -ia

nam maria Italiam ferē circumstant │ for the seas almost surround Italy

Note:

[i] genitive plural in -ium (e.g. gentium)

[ii] neuter nominative (and accusative) plural in -ia (maria)

[iii] neuter ablative singular in -ī (marī); some masculine and feminine nouns may have alternative ablative singular forms e.g. cīve / cīvī; nāve / nāvī

Those endings [-ium; -ia; -ī] differ from other 3rd declension nouns. Compare:

[i] genitive plural

[a] clāmōrēs spectātōrum (the shouts of the spectators) [b] Rōma est maxima urbium

[ii] neuter nominative (and accusative) plural:

[a] iūra … dīligenter servābantur (rights were carefully protected) [b] nam maria Italiam ferē circumstant

[iii] ablative singular

[a] Urbs Rōma ab ōre flūminis Tiberis nōn longē abest (The city of Rome is not far away from the mouth of the River Tiber) [b] ā marī paucae nāvēs Rōmam veniunt

[2] There is a fourth ending which applies to i-stem nouns: the accusative plural of masculine and feminine nouns can be either -ēs (like other 3rd declension nouns) or -īs (only i-stem nouns) i.e. -īs is an alternative ending, not a complete replacement.

[3] Some dictionaries and vocabulary lists indicate i-stems either by simply stating it e.g. Wiktionary: nāvis f (genitive nāvis); third declension, i-stem, or by giving the genitive plural ending e.g. nāvis, -is, nāvium [3/f]. However, not all will do that and, in fact, Wiktionary is not consistent in the information it provides.

Below are the i-stem nouns used in this text and in the previous one:

caedēs, -is, caedium [3/f]: massacre; slaughter

cīvis, -is, cīvium [3 m/f]: citizen

classis, -is, classium [3/f]: fleet

gēns, gentis, gentium [3/f]: race; tribe

hostis, -is, hostium [3/m]: enemy

mare, -is, marium [3/n]: sea

nāvis, -is, navium [3/f]: ship

urbs, urbis, urbium [3/f]: city

[4] How can you know they are i-stem nouns if nobody tells you?

When learning any language there are features that are more important than others. There is a risk, which I have experienced too, of becoming dragged down by lengthy explanations of comparatively minor points which simply interrupts the flow of learning. Moreover, explanations – especially if you’re still finding your way around Latin – can seem daunting, full of complex terms that can be difficult to remember and with many exceptions and, at times, inconsistencies in information given, for example, in online sources.

Depending on your level of Latin, and depending on how deeply you want to explore, you can choose:

Choice #1: Read through the information above, note the differences in endings and the alternative ending [-ium, -ī, -ia, -ēs / -īs], all of which is summarised in images #1 and #2, and move on. The differences are slight and generally do not affect comprehension.

Choice #2: We will look at the characteristics which indicate i-stem nouns; the topic will be discussed again at Level 3. However, bear in mind the following comments from Allen and Greenough’s Latin grammar: “There is much variety in the practice of the ancients”; “The i-declension was confused even to the Romans themselves” i.e. A & G indicate that, whatever ‘patterns’ or ‘rules’ are listed, usage over the centuries is not consistent.

To identify i-stem nouns, we can put the nouns into three categories but, as mentioned above, there are exceptions.

(1) Image #1: Nouns in the 3rd declension can be classified as [1] increasing and [2] non-increasing; those terms refer to the number of syllables in the nominative and genitive singular

[1] increasing nouns: those with one or more syllables in the genitive singular than the nominative singular

Nominative singular: ōs (1 syllable); ho-mō (2 syllables); spec-tā-tor (3 syllables)

Genitive singular: ō-ris (2 syllables); ho-mi-nis (3 syllables); spec-tā-tō-ris (4 syllables)

[2] non-increasing nouns (also known as parisyllabic): the same number of syllables in the nominative and genitive singular

Nominative singular: cae-dēs; cī-vis; hos-tis (2 syllables)

Genitive singular: cae-dis; cī-vis; hos-tis (2 syllables)

Image #1 compare:

[A] increasing noun with [B] non-increasing noun

[A]

Nominative Singular: ho-mō (2 syllables)

Genitive Singular: ho-mi-nis (3 syllables)

Ablative Singular: ho-mi-ne

Accusative Plural: ho-mi-nēs

Genitive Plural: ho-mi-num

[i] In [B] the changes apply to the non-increasing nouns:

Nominative Singular: nā-vis (2 syllables)

Genitive Singular: nā-vis (2 syllables)

Ablative Singular: (1) nāve, or (2) nāvī, but the alternative ending in -ī is inconsistent; some nouns show this ending and some do not; the -ī ending is found more in poetry*

Accusative Plural: (1) na-vēs, or (2) navīs i.e. alternative endings

Genitive Plural: nā-vium

Similarly:

cīvis (citizen) > abl sg: cīve / cīvī; acc pl: cīvēs / cīvīs; gen pl: cīvium

classis (fleet) > abl sg: classe / classī; acc pl: classēs / classīs; gen pl: classium

*[ii] Again, note this comment from Allen and Greenough: “The ablative singular … of many masculines and feminines, ends in -ī” i.e. not all of them, for example:

hostis (enemy) > *abl sg. hoste (i.e. no alternative ending in -ī)*; acc pl: hostēs / hostīs; gen pl: hostium

caedes (slaughter) > *abl sg. caede (i.e. no alternative ending in -ī)*; acc pl: caedēs / caedīs; gen pl: caedium

Image #1 shows that these changes / alternative endings (marked in red) are very few and do not affect comprehension

[iii] Image #2: Look out for a handful of nouns that have an alternative accusative in -im (rather than -em), a common example being turris, -is [3/f]: tower

(2) Image #3: monosyllabic (one syllable) nouns which end in a consonant + /s/:

Nominative Singular: urbs

Accusative Plural: (1) urbēs, or (2) urbīs

Genitive Plural: urbium

dēns (tooth) > acc pl: dentēs / dentīs; gen pl: dentium

This category is quite distinctive. Here are some common nouns which decline in the same way as urbs:

dēns (tooth) > acc pl: dentēs / dentīs; gen pl: dentium

gēns (tribe) > acc pl: gentēs / gentīs; gen pl: gentium

mōns (mountain) > acc pl: montēs / montīs; gen pl: montium

nox [x = /ks/ = ‘2 consonants’] > acc pl: noctēs / noctīs; gen pl: noctium

pars (part) > acc pl: partēs / partīs; gen pl: partium.

(3) image #4: neuter nouns ending in -e, -al, -ar nouns have [i] -ī in the ablative singular [ii] -ia in the nominative and accusative plural, and [iii] -ium in the genitive plural

Many of these nouns do not frequently occur, but some common ones are:

cochlear, cochleāris [3/n]: spoon

exemplar, exemplāris [3/n]: pattern; copy; example

vectīgal, -is [3/n]: tax; tribute


____________________

In the beginning Rome was a small town. It increased its power by war. The first battle was fought the neighboring nations. The courage of the neighbouring nations was great, but the Romans were the victors. At last Rome was the mistress of Italy. The Carthaginians lived across the sea. They were the enemies of the Romans. They had a great fleet; therefore they ruled the sea. They had a large number of long ships and loved war. There were long wars between the Romans and the Carthaginians; the slaughter was great. At last the Romans were the victors, and so Rome was the mistress of the sea. Wars were then waged in Asia, in Gaul, and in Britain. At last Asia, Gaul, and Britain were under the power of Rome. Thus Roman power on land and sea was the greatest.